linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 May 2008 21:05:57 +0930
From:	David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
CC:	Jianjun Kong <kongjianjun@...il.com>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments

Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 05/21/2008 07:58 AM, Jianjun Kong wrote:
>> Standard indentation of arguments.
>> I use right blank space to displace the last table, in order to make
>> the arguments alining.
>
> I think, there is no "standard" on this. I personally do prefer
> indentation by tabs.

So do I, but that pales compared to how annoying I find patches that can
best be described as anal-retentive.  Let the person who writes the code
decide how to lay it out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/