[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0805210845090.13661@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 08:47:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24.7-rt8
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 00:46 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24.7-rt8 tree, which can be
> > downloaded from the location:
> >
> > http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/
>
> I ran mysql+oltp (ro) on 2.6.24.7-rt7 and 2.6.25-rt2 to compare
> throughput to their parent trees, and ended up with strange (and
> verified) looking performance curves for both trees. The changes in
> 2.6.24.7-rt8 and 2.6.25.4-rt3 cured the primary oddities.
The difference between 24-rt7 and 24-rt8 as well as with 25-rt2 and 25-rt3
is the deserialization of rwlocks. The rt patch as always serialized
readers to allow for priority inheritance with rwlocks. I wrote a patch to
break that and allow for multiple readers and still keep the priority
inheritance.
Your test probably had a bottle neck on a rwlock (same for rwsems)
somewhere that the new code solved.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists