[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200805211533.00221.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:32:59 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, lchiquitto@...ell.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: fix deadlock in HCD code
Am Mittwoch 21 Mai 2008 15:27:50 schrieb Jiri Kosina:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > > hcd_urb_list_lock is used for synchronization between IRQ and non-IRQ
> > > contexts, so the non-IRQ context has to disable IRQs in order to prevent
> > > deadlocking with IRQ context.
> > Which non-irq context is that?
>
> One example -- assume usb_submit_urb() called from non-IRQ context. Then
>
> usb_hcd_submit_urb() -> rh_urb_enqueue() -> rh_queue_status() ->
> usb_hcd_link_urb_to_ep().
>
This turns out not to be the case. Interrupts are disabled.
static int rh_queue_status (struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb)
{
int retval;
unsigned long flags;
int len = 1 + (urb->dev->maxchild / 8);
spin_lock_irqsave (&hcd_root_hub_lock, flags);
if (hcd->status_urb || urb->transfer_buffer_length < len) {
dev_dbg (hcd->self.controller, "not queuing rh status urb\n");
retval = -EINVAL;
goto done;
}
retval = usb_hcd_link_urb_to_ep(hcd, urb);
I'll investigate.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists