[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0805211042070.2490-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:46:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <lchiquitto@...ell.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: fix deadlock in HCD code
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > > Used in the suspend code. Your patch is indeed correct, but I fear
> > > there might be a second bug caused by wrong calling conditions.
> > The problem in the Novell bugzilla entry was caused by the fact that the
> > OHCI irq routine was invoked with interrupts enabled, owing to a missing
> > IRQF_DISABLED flag. That bug has already been fixed in 2.6.25.
>
> That indeed is 2.6.25 kernel. I guess you are talking about commit
> 442258e2ff69 here.
Yes.
> If so, the reporter is definitely using the kernel
> containing this commit, and the lockups still trigger.
>
> Seems that my patch is papering over the real bug (someone enabling
> interrupts somewhere) indeed, but I can't seem to be able to find such
> codepath.
You could try testing the interrupt-enable flag at various places
in ohci-hcd (start with finish_urb) and printing an error message if
interrupts are enabled.
One possibility is that in an earlier call to finish_urb,
usb_hcd_giveback_urb was called with interrupts disabled and returned
with interrupts enabled. In other words, some driver's callback
routine may have enabled interrupts incorrectly.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists