[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48343764.7020800@csr.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:53:24 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@....com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
lchiquitto@...ell.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: fix deadlock in HCD code
Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008, David Vrabel wrote:
>
>> Alan Stern wrote:
>>> The functions you are worried about (usb_hcd_link_urb_to_ep and
>>> usb_hcd_unlink_urb_from_ep) are documented as requiring that interrupts
>>> be disabled by their callers. This patch isn't needed.
>> This requirement is the only reason the whci-hcd driver disables
>> interrupts. Removing this requirement would reduce the time that
>> interrupts are disabled in the whci-hcd driver.
>
> That doesn't sound like a valid approach. If you don't disable
> interrupts then you aren't protected against an interrupt handler
> submitting an URB and accessing your data structures while whci-hcd is
> in the middle of updating them.
I can't see how urbs can be submitted to whci-hcd from an interrupt
handler (urb callbacks are always called from a workqueue thread) but
they could be submitted from a timer, so you are correct.
David
--
David Vrabel, Senior Software Engineer, Drivers
CSR, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Tel: +44 (0)1223 692562
Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ http://www.csr.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists