[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080521151430.GG32643@halcrowt61p.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:14:30 -0500
From: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...ibm.com>
To: Andrea Righi <righiandr@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <prussell@....ibm.com>,
"David J. Kleikamp" <shaggy@...ibm.com>,
"SERGE E. HALLYN" <sergeh@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Privileged kthread for lower file opens
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:16:15AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Michael Halcrow wrote:
>> + req = kmem_cache_alloc(ecryptfs_open_req_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!req) {
>> + rc = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + mutex_init(&req->mux);
>> + req->lower_file = lower_file;
>> + req->lower_dentry = lower_dentry;
>> + req->lower_mnt = lower_mnt;
>> + req->requesting_task = current;
>> + req->flags = 0;
>> + mutex_lock(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.mux);
>> + mutex_lock(&req->mux);
>> + if (ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.flags & ECRYPTFS_KTHREAD_ZOMBIE) {
>> + rc = -EIO;
>
> Isn't a mutex_unlock(&req->mux) missing here?
Nobody else actually has a reference to req at this point, so the
unlock is not really necessary. It might not be a bad idea to jump to
out_unlock anyway just to avoid future bugs.
>> + mutex_unlock(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.mux);
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: We are in the middle of shutting down; "
>> + "aborting privileged request to open lower file\n",
>> + __func__);
>> + goto out_free;
>> + }
>> + list_add_tail(&req->kthread_ctl_list, &ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.req_list);
>> + mutex_unlock(&req->mux);
>> + mutex_unlock(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.mux);
>> + wake_up(&ecryptfs_kthread_ctl.wait);
>> +schedule:
>> + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>> + schedule();
>> + mutex_lock(&req->mux);
>> + if (req->flags == 0) {
>> + mutex_unlock(&req->mux);
>> + goto schedule;
>> + }
>> + set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>> + if (req->flags & ECRYPTFS_REQ_DROPPED
>> + || req->flags & ECRYPTFS_REQ_ZOMBIE) {
>> + rc = -EIO;
>> + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Privileged open request dropped\n",
>> + __func__);
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> + }
>> + if (IS_ERR(*req->lower_file)) {
>> + rc = PTR_ERR(*req->lower_file);
>> + dget(lower_dentry);
>> + mntget(lower_mnt);
>> + (*lower_file) = dentry_open(lower_dentry, lower_mnt,
>> + (O_RDONLY | O_LARGEFILE));
>> + if (IS_ERR(*lower_file)) {
>> + rc = PTR_ERR(*req->lower_file);
>> + (*lower_file) = NULL;
>> + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Error attempting privileged "
>> + "open of lower file with either RW or RO "
>> + "perms; rc = [%d]. Giving up.\n",
>> + __func__, rc);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +out_unlock:
>> + mutex_unlock(&req->mux);
>> +out_free:
>> + kmem_cache_free(ecryptfs_open_req_cache, req);
>> +out:
>> + return rc;
>> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists