linux-kernel - Re: Suggestion About Kernel Releases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 May 2008 18:26:56 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Tarkan Erimer" <tarkan@...one.net.tr>
Cc:	"Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@...il.com>,
	"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Suggestion About Kernel Releases

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr> wrote:
> It is. As I described above : the "testX" series will change the things as
> producing more tested /stable releases. BTW, it should be much better to
> release less, trouble free kernels instead of releasing fast but fixing
> soon.

You keep saying that but it simply is not true. The more people we
have _waiting_ for a "stable" kernel to graduate from the "testing"
series, the less people we have actually _testing_ the kernel.

So it's probable that your suggestion actually makes the current
situation worse, not better.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/