[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <483461DA.3060304@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 19:54:34 +0200
From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aviro@...hat.com, drepper@...hat.com,
sds@...ho.nsa.gov, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] correct flags to f_mode conversion in __dentry_open
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 05:59:52PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> does 11 really mean and should it really always be mapped to (FMODE_READ
>>> | FMODE_WRITE) or should it continue to get mapped to 'no permission?'
>> We've always mapped 3 to "no permission" to read or write. It's a linuxism
>
> I've tripped over this recently aswell. It would for sure be useful
> to add a sumbolic O_FOO constant for this magic value '3' and document
> it in the manpage.
Late follow-up to this thread
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/653123):
I propose to add the following text to the open(2) man page.
Unlike the other values that can be specified in flags,
the access mode values O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY, and O_RDWR, do
not specify individual bits. Rather, they define the low
order two bits of flags, and are defined respectively as
0, 1, and 2. In other words, the combination O_RDONLY |
O_WRONLY is a logical error, and certainly does not have
the same meaning as O_RDWR. Linux reserves the special,
non-standard access mode 3 (binary 11) in flags to mean:
check for read and write permission on the file and
return a descriptor that can't be used for reading or
writing. This non-standard access mode is used by some
Linux drivers to return a descriptor that is only to be
used for device-specific ioctl(2) operations.
Seem okay?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists