[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080521182949.GL8581@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 14:29:49 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] (RESEND) ext3[34] barrier changes
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:03:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> afaik there is no need to enable this feature if the machine (actually
> the disks) are on a UPS, yes?
Yes, as long as you're confident that there won't be a kernel
bug/regression causing a lockup while the server is under severe
memory pressure while doing lots of fsync's, file creations, renames,
etc. And as long as your 100% confident that UPS's will never fail,
janitors will never accidentally hit the Emergency Power Office
switch, and so on.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists