lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1211331501.5915.248.camel@brick>
Date:	Tue, 20 May 2008 17:58:21 -0700
From:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	jgarzik@...ox.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc drivers/net endianness noise

On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 01:55 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 05:48:00PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > I was contemplating an api like:
> > 
> > void put_le16(u16 val, __le16 *ptr)
> > {
> > 	*ptr = cpu_to_le16(val);
> > }
> > 
> > which would allow the above to become:
> > 
> > 	if (catc->is_f5u011)
> > 		put_be16(skb->len, tx_buf);
> > 	else
> > 		put_le16(skb->len, tx_buf);
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> Do not grow API too much.  Mental savings on recognizing what's done are
> offset by need to remember more helper functions...

Fair point, I was hoping to get the following family:

get_le16
put_le16

get_unaligned_le16
put_unaligned_le16

And get rid of the le16_to_cpup api.

Then the it's explicit when alignment is an issue, and the endianess is
also explicit.  That and I think it just looks nicer than the existing
*p versions.

Just a thought,

Harvey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ