| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4834882C.9000703@keyaccess.nl> Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 22:38:04 +0200 From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl> To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net Subject: Re: CFD: linux-wanking@...r.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments) On 21-05-08 21:45, Theodore Tso wrote: > (But if they are getting their patches ripped apart during the code > review, and that's causing them to lose face inside their company, > that's a different problem.) Yes. Their company's problem. I must say I'm getting rather sick of this hiding behind culture. Does anyone think it's good for _anyone_ from any culture to be publicly called upon their mistakes? Public is simply what this development is and what makes it different from other types. People who can't deal with it either grow up, go away or better still, try their damndest to minimise mistakes to avoid the experience in the first place. That last one in fact is one of the fundamental reason why open source works. Do feel free to call me a culturally insensitive clod -- I'll wear the badge with pride... Rene. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists