lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 21 May 2008 17:38:32 -0400
From:	Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Cc:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: Additional kconfig targets (cloneconfig, nonint_oldconfig etc)

On Wed, 21 May 2008 17:11:39 -0400
Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 04:47:03PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> 
>  > > 3) Implement newsymbolsconfig (any better name?)
>  > >    Shall list all new symbols and shall not write
>  > >    any config
>  > 
>  > I'm not sure I see the point of #3.
> 
> It's something we've had in Fedora kernels forever, because
> when rebasing to a new upstream version the process becomes
> 
> make newsymbolsconfig
> take list of symbols, and make decisions on them
> make oldconfig
> 
>

Ah, I see.  My process has always been:


cp arch/x86/configs/foo_defconfig .config
make oldconfig
make obvious decisions about new symbols, choose defaults if unknown
diff -u arch/x86/configs/foo_defconfig .config
figure out if any decisions or defaults are incorrect, change accordingly
make oldconfig (more decisions if there are new symbols exposed)
cp .config arch/x86/configs/foo_defconfig && commit


> without it, the process would be..
> 
> make oldconfig
> note new symbol, make decision
> make oldconfig
> note a 2nd new symbol, make decision
> make oldconfig
> note a 3rd new symbol..
> make oldconfig..
> you get the idea.
> 
> The way we have it isn't perfect, (adding a new symbol may unhide
> another set of new symbols), but it reduces the number of iterations
> needed dramatically.
> 
> 	Dave
> 

My build has broken again, which is why I'm inquiring about the status
of this; I'm not going to bother fixing it if my patches are never going
to end up upstream..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ