[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080521153223.e989cb88.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:32:23 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] provide rtc_cmos platform device
On Tue, 20 May 2008 22:25:56 +0400
Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Recently (around 2.6.25) I've noticed
> that RTC no longer works for me.
So it's a regression.
> It turned out this is because I use
> pnpacpi=off kernel option to work
> around the parport_pc bugs.
> I always did so, but RTC used to work
> fine in the past, and now it have
> regressed.
Albeit a fairly obscure one. I tagged the patch for backporting, let
those guys decide ;)
> The attached patch fixes the problem
> by creating the platform device for
> the RTC when PNP is disabled.
> This may also help running the
> PNP-enabled kernel on an older PCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
I suppose that on this basis:
arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 26 +++++++++-----------------
include/asm-x86/rtc.h | 4 ++++
it should be considered an x86 patch. I shall treat it as such.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists