[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0805211634r41cd2bafp94615fdfbdd4b7f7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 19:34:28 -0400
From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: "Bryan Wu" <cooloney@...nel.org>, michael.hennerich@...log.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Linux Kernel List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + pcmcia-add-support-the-cf-pcmcia-driver-for-blackfin-try-2.patch added to -mm tree
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:08 PM, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> +config BFIN_CFPCMCIA
>> + tristate "Blackfin CompactFlash PCMCIA Driver"
>> + depends on PCMCIA && BLACKFIN
>> + help
>> + Say Y here to support the CompactFlash PCMCIA driver for Blackfin.
please add a common statement that tells you the module name if the
user builds it as a module.
>> + * author: Michael Hennerich (hennerich@...ckfin.uclinux.org)
shouldnt this be MODULE_AUTHOR() ?
>> + u_int irq;
>> + u_short cd_pfx;
u_int forms are weird ... i'd wonder why we have these variations
anywhere in the kernel
>> +static int __init bfin_cf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
should be __devinit
>> + cd_pfx = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1); /*Card Detect GPIO PIN */
>> + if (cd_pfx > MAX_BLACKFIN_GPIOS)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (gpio_request(cd_pfx, "pcmcia: CD")) {
i dont think that MAX_BLACKFIN_GPIOS check is needed. the
gpio_request() function should already be doing it.
>> + printk(KERN_ERR
>> + "BF5xx flash: Failed ro request Card Detect GPIO_%d\n",
"BF5xx flash" ?
>> + cf = kzalloc(sizeof *cf, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!cf)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
we dont call gpio_free() here or in the fail0 case below.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists