[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080521221536.204da871.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 22:15:36 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org>
Cc: Shi Weihua <shiwh@...fujitsu.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jmorris@...ei.org,
ltp-list@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix sys_prctl() returned uninitialized value
On Wed, 21 May 2008 22:01:17 -0700 "Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org> wrote:
> this is the default expected by the subsequent switch ().
>
oh gawd.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
> index 895d2d4..cb25a64 100644
> --- a/kernel/sys.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -1657,6 +1657,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
> if (security_task_prctl(option, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5, &error))
> return error;
All along I was believing that it was _this_ return which was causing
the problem.
> + error = 0;
> +
> switch (option) {
> case PR_SET_PDEATHSIG:
> if (!valid_signal(arg2)) {
But now I see it.
This was a hard way to write a changelog.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists