lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 22 May 2008 14:12:02 +0530
From:	Srinivasa DS <srinivasa@...ibm.com>
To:	Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@...il.com>
CC:	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ananth Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] To improve kretprobe scalability

Abhishek Sagar wrote:
> On 5/21/08, Srinivasa D S <srinivasa@...ibm.com> wrote:
>>  Solution:
>>    1) Instead of having one global lock to protect kretprobe instances
>>  present in kretprobe object and kretprobe hash table. We will have two locks,
>>  one lock for protecting kretprobe hash table and another lock for kretporbe
>>  object.
> 
> Is it possible to get rid of the kretprobe hash table itself and lose
> the kretprobe_lock? It seems like it is just doing a pid-to-instance
> mapping. These return instances could be queued in the "current"
> task_struct in a LIFO manner. Mutation to this per-task list can be
> done with local irqs off...
> 

There were ideas of storing kretprobe instances in task_struct to get 
rid of locking, but that would require extending task_struct and 
catching each task exit, destroying its kretprobe instances. This makes 
code more invasive.
But in this implementation (global hash table, hashed by task), we
lock only the current task's hash bucket and hence we have fairly low 
contention.

Thanks
  Srinivasa DS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ