linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH take 2 01/28] VFS: introduce writeback_inodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <483550C5.1010100@yandex.ru>
Date:	Thu, 22 May 2008 13:53:57 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH take 2 01/28] VFS: introduce writeback_inodes_sb()

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru> wrote:
>> is it OK for you if ubifs-2.6.git will have some patches which ubi-2.6.git
>> also contains. Will your -mm system handle this?
> 
> It happens occasionally and I usually manage to work it out.  Sometimes
> with git hackery, sometimes manually.  It'd be better if it was a
> once-off thing, rather than having new conflicts arise each time I
> repull the trees, if possible.

OK. The thing is that we'd like to have UBI patches in UBIFS tree to give
them a test. So what I've done I've created a branch named "for_andrew".
Could you please switch your scripts from "master" branch to "for_andrew"
branch? This branch will have the same but UBI patches which are already
in the UBI tree and would cause conflicts.

Thanks.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/