linux-kernel - Re: Number of bugs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e2e108260805220938w718d39ddh633c48a6373fd682@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 May 2008 18:38:18 +0200
From:	"Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
To:	"Stefan Richter" <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...nel.org>,
	"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>,
	"Bosko Radivojevic" <bosko.radivojevic@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Natalie Protasevich" <protasnb@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Number of bugs - statistics

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Bosko Radivojevic
<bosko.radivojevic@...il.com> wrote:
> Is there any kind of analysis of number of (reported or resolved) bugs
> through time in Linux kernel floating around? I'm trying to convince
> my colleagues that newer kernel version does not mean more bugs than
> the previous 'well tested' ones.

The following summary of a speech by Andrew Morton contains good
arguments as why you should use a recent kernel:
http://lwn.net/Articles/278647/

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/