[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080522140420.GA20613@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 10:04:20 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [X86] Remove unnecessary code in 64bit CPU identification.
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 04:55:28PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > Moving along the same direction.. Moving the vendor specific bits out of setup_64.c
> > into cpu/ would go a long way towards killing of setup64.c. I took a first pass at doing this
> > in the diff below. So far I only looked at the AMD specific bits, and haven't done
> > a complete conversion to cpu_dev style initialisation as done on 32bit, but that
> > can easily be performed later after moving all the code out into its respective places.
> > (downside: a bunch of externs in the interim).
> >
> > comments on this before I go any further?
> >
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I was going to pull this into -tip, but I need a Signed-off-by: line in
> order to do so. Could you resend this so we can add it to -tip?
Yeah, I was going to rediff against tip and resend them, but I went
into the office instead yesterday, where nothing productive ever happens :-)
I'll get to it today.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists