linux-kernel - Re: fair group scheduler not so fair?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1211486868.6463.134.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Thu, 22 May 2008 22:07:48 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	mingo@...e.hu, pj@....com
Subject: Re: fair group scheduler not so fair?

On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 14:02 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:

> I haven't really dug into the scheduler yet (although that's next), but 
> based on these results it doesn't really look like the load balancer is 
> properly group-aware.

I'm trying, but its turning out to be rather more difficult than
expected. Any help here would be much appreciated.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/