[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080522201829.GE3226@local>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 22:18:29 +0200
From: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...utronix.de>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, hjk@...utronix.de, gregkh@...e.de,
Uwe Kleine-König <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@...i.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/03] uio: Add enable_irq() callback
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:58:24PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com> wrote:
> > Add enable_irq() callback to struct uio_info. This callback is needed by
> > the uio_platform driver so interrupts can be enabled before blocking.
>
> We can most likely use a single uio platform driver if this patch is
> acceptable. Any NAKs?
Yes. Your approach only allows enabling interrupts, but not disabling
them. And I don't like that it is not possible for generic userspace
tools to find out if a UIO device has this auto-irq-enabling capability
or not.
I just posted a patch that allows enabling _and_ disabling of irqs from
userspace by writing 0 or 1 to /dev/uioX. I've CCed you, could you
please test? If this doesn't do what you need, please let me know.
Thanks,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists