linux-kernel - Re: Automatical unification of i8259.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080522203027.GA24212@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Thu, 22 May 2008 22:30:27 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, macro@....pg.gda.pl
Subject: Re: Automatical unification of i8259.c

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:19:25PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > Make conversion of i8259 very mechanical -- i8259 was generated by
> > > diff -D, with too different parts left in i8259_32 and
> > > i8259_64.c. Only "by hand" changes were removal of #ifdef from middle
> > > of the comment (prevented compilation) and removal of one static to
> > > allow splitting into files.
> > > 
> > > Of course, it will need some cleanups now, and those will follow.
> > 
> > Applied. Thanks,
> 
> Does that mean that followup patches are in, too? This is really too
> ugly to live alone ;-).
Hint:
Look at:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=shortlog;h=x86/i8259

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/