[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080523092626.GE27119@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 05:26:26 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 11/14] vfs: move executable checking into ->permission()
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 07:15:09PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
>
> For execute permission on a regular files we need to check if file has
> any execute bits at all, regardless of capabilites.
>
> This check is normally performed by generic_permission() but was also
> added to the case when the filesystem defines its own ->permission()
> method. In the latter case the filesystem should be responsible for
> performing this check.
>
> So create a helper function exec_permission() that checks returns
> -EACCESS if MAY_EXEC is present, the inode is a regular file and no
> execute bits are present in inode->i_mode.
>
> Call this function from filesystems which don't call
> generic_permission() from their ->permission() methods and which
> aren't already performing this check. Also remove the check from
> dentry_permission().
>
> The new code should be equivalent to the old.
There's no point moving this into the filesystem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists