[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1211536814.5851.18.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 12:00:14 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith@...gsmith.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL pgbench performance regression in 2.6.23+
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 03:13 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> With this feedback, any ideas on where to go next? There seems like's
> some room for improvement still left here.
Dunno. This load is very highly tweakable, and doesn't seem to like
preemption much at all. You can see below what preemption is doing to
2.6.22.18 by looking at the batch numbers. SCHED_BATCH turns the O(1)
scheduler into a pathetic little round-robin scheduler, and this load
loves pathetic :-) After seeing the batch numbers, I tweaked .git to
make it as round-robin as I could.
My take on the numbers is that both kernels preempt too frequently for
_this_ load.. but what to do, many many loads desperately need
preemption to perform.
2.6.22.18 2.6.22.18-batch 2.6.26.git 2.6.26.git.batch
1 7487.115236 7643.563512 9999.400036 9915.823582
2 17074.869889 15360.150210 14042.644140 14958.375329
3 25073.139078 24802.446538 15621.206938 25047.032536
4 24236.413612 26126.482482 16436.055117 25007.183313
5 26367.198572 28298.293443 19926.550734 27853.081679
6 24695.827843 30786.651975 22375.916107 28119.474302
8 21020.949689 31973.674156 25825.292413 31070.664011
10 22792.204610 31775.164023 26754.471274 31596.415197
15 21202.173186 30388.559630 28711.761083 30963.050265
20 21204.041830 29317.044783 28512.269685 30127.614550
30 18519.965964 27252.739106 26682.613791 28185.244056
40 17936.447579 25670.803773 24964.936746 26282.369366
50 16247.605712 25089.154310 21078.604858 25356.750461
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists