[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080523120617.6a4c115c@core>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 12:06:17 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel
On Fri, 23 May 2008 11:03:53 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Thu, 22 May 2008 21:22:04 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > This pushes the lock a fair way down and the final kill looks like it
> > should be an easy project for someone who wants to have a shot at it.
>
> and makes some gratuitous stylistic changes as well. Please don't do
> that!
Andrew shouts at me if I send him patches that don't fix the style of
the lines around so you get some style changes even when I cut bits out
of diffs. I think that approach is *stupid* too and style should be done
after for the entire file.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists