lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080523131310.GC9245@ucw.cz>
Date:	Fri, 23 May 2008 15:13:10 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] lib: add byteorder helpers for the aligned case

On Tue 2008-05-20 11:05:21, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> Some users know the pointer they are writeing to are aligned,
> rather than doing *(__le16 *)ptr = cpu_to_le16(val) add helpers
> wrapping this up that have the same convention as put_unaligned_le/be.
> 
> Although the get_be/le versions duplicate the le16_to_cpup functionality
> add them anyway as it makes this a complete api and start work to
> eliminate {le|be}{16|32|64}_to_cpup uses (not many).
> 
> This makes the api look like:
> 
> get_unaligned_le16
> put_unaligned_le16
> 
> get_le16
> put_le16
> 
> With explicit alignment constraints.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/byteorder/generic.h |   60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h b/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
> index 0846e6b..1f0c07e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
> +++ b/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
> @@ -119,6 +119,66 @@
>  #define cpu_to_be16s __cpu_to_be16s
>  #define be16_to_cpus __be16_to_cpus
>  
> +static inline u16 get_le16(void *ptr)
> +{
> +	return le16_to_cpu(*(__le16 *)ptr);
> +}
> +

Document the fact that void * passed in needs to be 16-bit aligned?

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ