[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15168.1211558968@vena.lwn.net>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 10:09:28 -0600
From: corbet@....net (Jonathan Corbet)
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: video4linux-list@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mchehab@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video4linux: Push down the BKL
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> The problem is that currently they are almost all unsafe - I did a quick
> survey as part of the changes. Pushing it down to the video2_ioctl is a
> starting point, but the v4l layer is going to need a lot of love and its
> own gradual migration.
Agreed.
> Right now we've gone from BKL buried in fs to BKL at top of v4l layer
> which is indeed only a starting point. I'd assumed the same as you are
> think a new video_ioctl2 and switching drivers one by one (I was assuming
> adding video2_ioctl_unlocked())
It sound like we're thinking the same way, yes. Except I'd pick the
long name for the one we want to get rid of :)
BTW, drop me a pointer if you'd like this series pulled into the
ever-growing bkl-removal tree.
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists