[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4836F68D.4090603@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 18:53:33 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aoliva@...hat.com,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Abhay Salunke <Abhay_Salunke@...l.com>,
kay.sievers@...y.org, Haroldo Gamal <gamal@...ernex.com.br>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] firmware: allow firmware files to be built into kernel
image
On 23-05-08 18:44, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:38:41PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 06:21:01PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>> Looks good.
>>> But do we need the firmware after init?
>>> In other owrds could it be inside a discard after init block?
>> What is you can hotplug the device and hence need to initialize the same
>> device type multiple times? Wouldn't keeping the firmware around be
>> useful then? How about on suspend/resume, do you need to reload
>> firmware in those cases?
>
> There are cases where we need it after init.
> But if there are cases where we do not need it after init maybe
> we should be able to save some memory there?
>
> Let us get it working as is - then we can add such features later.
If embedded is the main consumer I would consider this a fairly vital
feature though.
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists