[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080523204912.GB4886@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 23:49:12 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel coding style for if ... else which cross #ifdef
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:42:28PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 02:11:43PM -0500, Steve French wrote:
> > A question splitting "else" and "if" on distinct lines vs. using an
> > extra line and extra #else came up as I was reviewing a proposed cifs
> > patch. Which is the preferred style?
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SOMETHING
> > if (foo)
> > something ...
> > else
> > #endif
> > if ((mode & S_IWUGO) == 0)
> >
> > or alternatively
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SOMETHING
> > if (foo)
> > something ...
> > else if ((mode & S_IWUGO) == 0)
> > #else
> > if ((mode & S_IWUGO) == 0)
> > #endif
>
> The second one is dangerous because if code evolves, chances are that
> only one of the two identical lines will be updated.
>
> At least the first one is clearly readable.
I would consider the first one much harder to read since you can _very_
easily miss that the "if" is in an "else" clause and completely misread
the code.
> But if you have tons of
> places with the same construct, it's better to create a macro which
> will inhibit the if branch, which gcc will happily optimize away.
> For instance :
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_FOO
> #define FOO_ENABLED 1
> #else
> #define FOO_ENABLED 0
> #endif
>
> if (FOO_ENABLED && foo)
> something
> else if ((mode & S_IWUGO) == 0)
> ...
>...
I'd also say that's the best solution.
> Regards,
> Willy
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists