[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1211582852.8297.347.camel@pasglop>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 18:47:32 -0400
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
Cc: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...escale.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: MMIO and gcc re-ordering (Was: [PATCH] [POWERPC]
Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code)
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 16:14 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> As Trent pointed out, if you change to eieio in the accessors, that'd
> require drivers to also use mmiowb() before spin_unlock(), which fewer
> drivers currently do.
No, this is a totally different issue. And we keep track of the need
for a sync in spin_unlock already.
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists