[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080523042231.GJ173056135@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 14:22:31 +1000
From: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To: Kentaro Makita <k-makita@...css.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dgc@....com, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
harvey.harrison@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]fix soft lock up at NFS mount by per-SB LRU-list of unused dentries
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:15:19AM +0900, Kentaro Makita wrote:
> Hi, David
>
> Thank you for reviewing the patch.
> I'd fix coding style issues at next post. And,...
>
> David Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:22:18AM +0900, Kentaro Makita wrote:
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >
> > I'm wondering if this loop is an excessively long time to be holding the
> > dcache_lock. I guess the hol dtime is limited by the size of *count being
> > passed in. I think we could also do a:
> >
> > cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
> >
> > in the loop here to prevent this from occurring....
> Did you mean:
> - scan sb->s_dentry_lru and move dentries to temporary list
> with lock held
> - cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
> - prune dentries on temporary list
> Is that right?
No, I meant while scanning sb->s_dentry_lru.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists