[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48387CCB.1030801@goop.org>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 21:38:35 +0100
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Tom Spink <tspink@...il.com>
CC: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel coding style for if ... else which cross #ifdef
Tom Spink wrote:
> A thought occurred to me that we may be able to used some preprocessor
> magic and do this:
>
> #define config_defined(x) CFGVAL_## x
>
> Which means that, if we get Kconfig to produce:
>
> #define CFGVAL_CONFIG_FOO 0
> #define CFGVAL_CONFIG_VALUE_BAR 1
> #define CFGVAL_CONFIG_VALUE_BAZ_MODULE 1
>
> We can use this:
>
> if (config_defined(CONFIG_FOO) && some_expr) {
> panic("Oh no.");
> }
Well, in that case you could use Willy's magic hack:
#define config_defined(x) (x - 0)
Which isn't a bad alternative to defining a whole pile of new symbols...
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists