linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] kconfig: introduce KCONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 24 May 2008 23:00:23 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kconfig: introduce KCONFIG_* symbols for .c files

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 01:48:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2008 22:24:27 +0200 Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> 
> > > It could help to get us out of the occasional sticky situation, but it
> > > does seem a bit risky.  What happens with Kconfig variables which are
> > > just not known about at all with some .configs?
> > > 
> > > Silly example, one could add
> > > 
> > > 	if (KCONFIG_DVB_VES1820)
> > > 
> > > to kernel/sched.c and that would work happily until someone sets DVB=n,
> > > in which case I assume KCONFIG_DVB_VES1820 doesn't get defined
> > > anywhere?
> > It would have helped if I had applied the correct patch...
> > All boolean and tristate symbols in the konfiguration have
> > their symbols defined as KCONFIG_* no matter their values.
> > So KCONFIG_DVB_VES1820 would get defined.
> 
> But there are still holes - KCONFIG_ARCH_FOOTBRIDGE wouldn't be defined
> on x86, for example.
Not today where we have one configuration definition per architecture.

I hope we one day can change that so we have one for the whole
kernel.
This would for example allow us to detect when someone do
a misspelled "depends on FOOBAR" because it will no longer be
a normal situation to depend on unknow symbols.


> Anything which is inside an `if' or inside an
> if/source/endif will not be known about?  I assume?
These symbols would be know of - their value would just be 0.
The correct patch (last one posted) does this.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/