linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] kconfig: introduce KCONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080524212628.GA4040@ucw.cz>
Date:	Sat, 24 May 2008 23:26:29 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kconfig: introduce KCONFIG_* symbols for .c files

Hi!

> One line smaller and we follow the normal flow in the program.
> The code is always build but we do not waste space as gcc will
> do proper code-elimination for us.
> 
> Today this is not possible because kconfig will only
> define CONFIG_FOO if selected and FOO is not a module.
> 
> The following patch implement a new set of defines in
> the KCONFIG_* namespace.

Could we s/KCONFIG_/CFG_/g ?

CONFIG_ is long enough already, and K there is very maningless.....


							Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/