[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <483827CE.9080200@goop.org>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 15:35:58 +0100
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel coding style for if ... else which cross #ifdef
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> I assume you wanted to say:
>
>> #undef CONFIG_FOO
>> #define CFG_FOO 1
>> #define CONFIG_FOO_MODULE
>> #define CFG_FOO_MODULE 1
>>
> Because then the CONFIG_* is not changed
> and we do not want to change that.
>
Yeah, I didn't intend to change the meaning of CONFIG_FOO.
> I'm not fully convinced about:
>
>> #define CFG_FOO 1
>>
> But on the other hand it is only in odd
> cases we distingush between built-in and module.
> So it makes most sense.
>
I think CONFIG_ and CFG_ should be exact parallels, so if CONFIG_FOO is
undefined, CFG_FOO should be 0.
>> Not sure what CFG_* should be for string/numeric options. Probably "1"
>> if the value is defined, "0" if not, with CONFIG_* being the actual
>> value (so a CONFIG_ value of 0 is distinguishable from not defined).
>>
> For non-boolean/tristate values we simply skip CFG_ values - thats
> the most simple approach.
I suppose, but it might be useful to know whether a constant is present:
if (CFG_THINGY_LIMIT && x > CONFIG_THINGY_LIMIT) {...}
(which fails if CONFIG_THINGY_LIMIT is undefined, so I guess it still
doesn't work very well).
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists