[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805252217580.3295@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 22:21:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, akpm@...l.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Clark Williams <clark.williams@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
On Sun, 25 May 2008, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 May 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > +/*
> > + * 5 usec on a 1GHZ machine. Not necessarily correct, but not too long
> > + * either.
>
> And what happens when we have 10GHz boxes that can do migration in 1us,
> and the delay that is asked for is 2us. We can return early. I don't like
> to place assumptions of this kind that can hurt with future hardware
> enhancements.
Do the math. It's 500ns on a 10GHz machine then. So nothing to worry
about and future proof.
Also when those 10GHZ machines arrive the synchronized TSC should have
finally become reality.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists