linux-kernel - Re: Pipe buffers' limit of 16 * 4K

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0805261612500.19084@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Mon, 26 May 2008 16:15:41 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	Fausto Richetti Blanco <fausto.blanco@...il.com>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: Pipe buffers' limit of 16 * 4K

On Saturday 2008-05-24 02:19, Fausto Richetti Blanco wrote:
>
>       I'm working with a 2.6.9 kernel (ok, I know it's quite old) and
>faced a problem with the 4K (one page) buffer limit for the pipes.
>I've found that in the 2.6.11 the pipes' buffers were changed to a
>circular list of pages which increased this limit to 16 * 4K. This
>limit is hardcoded here /usr/src/linux/include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h:6
>#define PIPE_BUFFERS (16)
>
>       Is there a reason for this not to be an adjustable parameter
>(eg.: by an ulimit in the userspace) ?

Jens had patches to adjust the pipe buffer sizes dynamically via an 
ioctl, perhaps these should really be pushed? I also had interest in 
having these in the kernel for toying with minibuffer audio processing.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/