linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] video4linux: Push down the BKL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 May 2008 18:01:54 -0400
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
To:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>, video4linux-list@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video4linux: Push down the BKL

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 06:10:27PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The hardest and optimal scenario is to look inside all drivers, fix the locks
> (and pray for a further patch to not break them). I'm afraid that this is a long
> term strategy.

Ultimately that is where you end up.

> For example, a very simple scenario would simply replace BKL by one mutex.
> This way, just one ioctl could be handled at the same time. This is something

video2_ioctl_serialized() ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/