linux-kernel - Re: gcc "internal error" with 32-bit userspace, 64-bit kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805261211040.3295@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:	Mon, 26 May 2008 12:12:25 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: gcc "internal error" with 32-bit userspace, 64-bit kernel

On Sun, 25 May 2008, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> I'm having a bit of a problem with the x86 32-bit compatibility and I
> don't really know how to debug it.
> 
> The problem is that gcc fails some builds with "internal error" when
> I'm running a 32-bit userspace on a 64-bit kernel. The same test
> scenario with a 32-bit kernel works fine.
> 
> More specifically, I'm using Red Hat's mock tool on Fedora 9 to build
> packages. It sets up a chroot:ed environment where (as far as I can
> tell) everything is from the target system. Building for 32-bit Fedora
> 8 succeeds, but not Fedora 9 or RHEL 5.
> 
> Ideas on how to proceed? From what I've read, the 32-bit compatibility
> of the kernel should be 100%.

Just tried to reproduce that with git of today. Did not happen.

Which kernel version are you using ?

Thanks,
	tglx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/