linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][v2][patch 0/12][CFQ-cgroup]Yet another I/O bandwidth controlling subsystem for CGroups based on CFQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 May 2008 11:46:27 +0900 (JST)
From:	Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@...inux.co.jp>
To:	s-uchida@...jp.nec.com
Cc:	axboe@...nel.dk, vtaras@...nvz.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, tom-sugawara@...jp.nec.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][v2][patch 0/12][CFQ-cgroup]Yet another I/O bandwidth
 controlling subsystem for CGroups based on CFQ

Hi Uchida-san,

Thanks for your comment.

> Where did you build expanded CFQ schedulers?
> I guess that schedulers can be control I/Os if it is built on guest OS,
> But not if on Dom0.
> I guess you built on Dom0 so that you could not control I/O. (maybe, you say)

I built them on guest OS.

> I'm testing both systems and get similar results.
> I will report my test in next week.

I'm looking forward to your report.

Thanks,
Ryo Tsuruta
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/