[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1211897854.12349.47.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:17:34 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
vatsa <vatsa@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 16:08 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 01:47:29PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >...
> > FYI your attitude in the past few weeks is getting on my nerves - you
> > act all self important but have not made a single contribution to the
> > kernel above the level of a janitor-newbie.
>
> Not a single contribution to the kernel above the level of a
> janitor-newbie?
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/676733
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/14/498
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/28/561
> ....
>
> Awaiting your apology
Oooh, you caught a few bugs in review... *applause*. Of course I
understand you just forgot to append the url or git commit of the patch
series that added a significant feature to the core kernel, or solved a
significant issue.
I mean, counting all the way up to 3, that must have been taxing you.
So of course I appologise for my ignorance of your intellectual feats
and invaluable contributions to the linux kernel. </sarcasm>
Seriously, you're a good janitor, and I appreciate that. Stick to it, or
help write code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists