linux-kernel - Re: + pcmcia-add-support-the-cf-pcmcia-driver-for-blackfin-try-2.patch added to -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 May 2008 23:49:45 +0800
From:	"Bryan Wu" <cooloney@...nel.org>
To:	"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>
Cc:	"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	"Linux Kernel List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + pcmcia-add-support-the-cf-pcmcia-driver-for-blackfin-try-2.patch added to -mm tree

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Hennerich, Michael
<Michael.Hennerich@...log.com> wrote:
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vapier.adi@...il.com]
>>Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2008 01:34
>>To: Bryan Wu; michael.hennerich@...log.com
>>Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org; Linux Kernel List
>>Subject: Re: +
> pcmcia-add-support-the-cf-pcmcia-driver-for-blackfin-try-
>>2.patch added to -mm tree
>>
>>On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:08 PM,  <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>>> +config BFIN_CFPCMCIA
>>>> +       tristate "Blackfin CompactFlash PCMCIA Driver"
>>>> +       depends on PCMCIA && BLACKFIN
>>>> +       help
>>>> +         Say Y here to support the CompactFlash PCMCIA driver for
>>Blackfin.
>>
>>please add a common statement that tells you the module name if the
>>user builds it as a module.
>>
>>>> + * author: Michael Hennerich (hennerich@...ckfin.uclinux.org)
>>
>>shouldnt this be MODULE_AUTHOR() ?
>
> Yes.
>
>>
>>>> +       u_int irq;
>>>> +       u_short cd_pfx;
>>
>>u_int forms are weird ... i'd wonder why we have these variations
>>anywhere in the kernel
>
> Beauty is in the eye of the beholder...
>
>>
>>>> +static int __init bfin_cf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>>should be __devinit
>>
>>>> +       cd_pfx = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);     /*Card Detect GPIO
> PIN
>>*/
>>>> +       if (cd_pfx > MAX_BLACKFIN_GPIOS)
>>>> +               return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> +       if (gpio_request(cd_pfx, "pcmcia: CD")) {
>>
>>i dont think that MAX_BLACKFIN_GPIOS check is needed.  the
>>gpio_request() function should already be doing it.
>>
>>>> +               printk(KERN_ERR
>>>> +                      "BF5xx flash: Failed ro request Card Detect
>>GPIO_%d\n",
>>
>>"BF5xx flash" ?
>>
>>>> +       cf = kzalloc(sizeof *cf, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> +       if (!cf)
>>>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>>
>>we dont call gpio_free() here or in the fail0 case below.
>
> Fixed.
>
> Bryan,
>  are you going to send a new patch?
>

No problem, I will take care of it.

-Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/