[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <483C35AA.5060102@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 17:24:10 +0100
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Question about interrupt routing and irq allocation
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> I'm initially targeting 32-bit, though obviously I'd like something
>> that works for both 32 and 64 bit. irq_cfg[] is missing in
>> io_apic_32.c; would I achieve the same effect by setting
>> irq_vector[irq] = 0xff or something?
>>
>
> ok, here comes the next phase of a rather cunning plan: please unify
> these vector allocators first! ;-)
>
Somehow I knew you were going to say that...
> it's nontrivial but would result in rather nice code. I dont know
> whether we want to extend per-CPU vectors to 32-bit as well ... but
> might be worth an attempt and we could give any exploratory patches a
> try in -tip. Eric, what do you think about the general approach?
>
> this would also pave the way towards unified APIC code. Hm
All of that sounds very appealing, particularly as the work on xen-dom0
continues. But in the meantime I'm just using create_irq(), and I'll
wear the wasted vector (after all, it will only happen when booting
under Xen-hvm).
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists