lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <483C5DF4.60508@zytor.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 May 2008 12:16:04 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
CC:	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, steiner@....com, travis@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] x86 boot: add code to add BIOS provided EFI memory
 entries to kernel

Paul Jackson wrote:
> 
> But I reply mine is better, because we can already provide, with the
> current EFI interfaces, all the entries from the boot loader to the
> kernel, so we do not need to provide them twice, a second time via an
> E820 map mechanism that must be revised and extended to handle the
> additional memory map entries past the first 128 of them.
> 

This was discussed over a year ago, and it was declared the boot 
loaders' responsibility.  Please go back and look at the archives for 
the discussion rather than rehashing it at this time.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ