linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86: I/O APIC: Timer through 8259A second-chance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0805271910130.18833@cliff.in.clinika.pl>
Date:	Tue, 27 May 2008 21:18:38 +0100 (BST)
From:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86: I/O APIC: Timer through 8259A second-chance

On Wed, 21 May 2008, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

>  Some systems incorrectly report the ExtINTA pin of the I/O APIC as the
> genuine target of the timer interrupt.  Here is a change that copies timer
> pin information found to the other pin if one has been found only.  This 
> way both a direct and a through-8259A route is tested with the pin letting 
> these problematic systems work well enough.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@...ux-mips.org>
> ---
> patch-2.6.26-rc1-20080505-timer-pins-0

 Please withdraw this patch only.  I shall follow with a replacement
series straight away.  Please apply patches in the order of submission.  
You should end up with 15 patches from both series combined.  Unless a 
problem is reported I think this concludes the work required for the timer 
for now.

  Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/