[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080527144023.bf47e3e6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 14:40:23 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc: joe@...ches.com, greg@...ah.com, nick@...k-andrew.net,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] debug printk infrastructure -compile fixes
On Thu, 22 May 2008 17:16:39 -0400
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_pptp.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_pptp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_pptp.c
> index 97e54b0..7fea304 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_pptp.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_pptp.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ void
> struct nf_conntrack_expect *exp) __read_mostly;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_nat_pptp_hook_expectfn);
>
> -#ifdef DEBUG
> +#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_PRINTK_DEBUG)
> /* PptpControlMessageType names */
> const char *const pptp_msg_name[] = {
> "UNKNOWN_MESSAGE",
Does this imply that the patch series will break bisectability? If so,
this fix should be merged into whichever patch introduces the build
breakage.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists