linux-kernel - [PATCH 000 of 3] md: raid5 patches suitable for 2.6.26 and -stable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080527162558.16305.patches@notabene>
Date:	Tue, 27 May 2008 16:31:53 +1000
From:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	<stable@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 000 of 3] md: raid5 patches suitable for 2.6.26 and -stable

Following are three patches that fixes bugs in raid5 that could
conceivable cause data corruption (1 and 3) or and oops (2).

Bugs 1 and 3 can cause a 'resync' to mistakenly think the partiy block
is correct when infact it isn't (it looks at a parity block that was
generated rather than read from disk).  If this happens to leave a
parity block wrong, and a device then fails, data regenerated based on
that parity block will be wrong.

Once a patched kernel is installed, running a repair pass 
(echo repair > .../sync_action) will fix any incorrect parity.

The Oops (patch 2) can only happen if you right to a partucular sysfs
file that only root has access to and only developer (currently) have
any reason to write to.

NeilBrown

 [PATCH 001 of 3] md: md: fix prexor vs sync_request race
 [PATCH 002 of 3] md: fix uninitialized use of mddev->recovery_wait
 [PATCH 003 of 3] md: Do not compute parity unless it is on a failed drive
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/