linux-kernel - [PATCH 003 of 3] md: Do not compute parity unless it is on a failed drive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id:  <1080527063217.16444@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 27 May 2008 16:32:17 +1000
From:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	<stable@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 003 of 3] md: Do not compute parity unless it is on a failed drive


From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>

If a block is computed (rather than read) then a check/repair operation
may be lead to believe that the data on disk is correct, when infact it
isn't.  So only compute blocks for failed devices.

This issue has been around since at least 2.6.12, but has become harder to hit
in recent kernels since most reads bypass the cache.

echo repair > /sys/block/mdN/md/sync_action will set the parity blocks to the
correct state.

Cc: <stable@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>

### Diffstat output
 ./drivers/md/raid5.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff .prev/drivers/md/raid5.c ./drivers/md/raid5.c
--- .prev/drivers/md/raid5.c	2008-05-27 16:24:18.000000000 +1000
+++ ./drivers/md/raid5.c	2008-05-27 16:24:41.000000000 +1000
@@ -2002,6 +2002,7 @@ static int __handle_issuing_new_read_req
 		 * have quiesced.
 		 */
 		if ((s->uptodate == disks - 1) &&
+		    (s->failed && disk_idx == s->failed_num) &&
 		    !test_bit(STRIPE_OP_CHECK, &sh->ops.pending)) {
 			set_bit(STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK, &sh->ops.pending);
 			set_bit(R5_Wantcompute, &dev->flags);
@@ -2087,7 +2088,9 @@ static void handle_issuing_new_read_requ
 			/* we would like to get this block, possibly
 			 * by computing it, but we might not be able to
 			 */
-			if (s->uptodate == disks-1) {
+			if ((s->uptodate == disks - 1) &&
+			    (s->failed && (i == r6s->failed_num[0] ||
+					   i == r6s->failed_num[1]))) {
 				pr_debug("Computing stripe %llu block %d\n",
 				       (unsigned long long)sh->sector, i);
 				compute_block_1(sh, i, 0);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/