| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <95711f160805280934y77ed7d91tec5aeb531bf8013c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 18:34:00 +0200 From: "Jens Bäckman" <jens.backman@...il.com> To: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com Subject: Re: Performance Characteristics of All Linux RAIDs (mdadm/bonnie++) On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com> wrote: > Results: > > http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/raid/20080528/raid-levels.html > http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/raid/20080528/raid-levels.txt Either the RAID 1 read speed must be wrong, or something is odd in the Linux implementation. There's six drives that can be used for reading at the same time, as they contain the very same data. 63MB/s sequential looks like what you would get from a single drive. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists