linux-kernel - Re: [X86] Fix up silly i1586 boot message.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 May 2008 19:48:03 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [X86] Fix up silly i1586 boot message.


On Wednesday 2008-05-28 18:57, Dave Jones wrote:

>Trying to boot a 64-bit kernel on a 32bit Pentium 4 gets
>you an amusing message along the lines of.
>"you need an x86-64, but you only have an i1586"
>due to the P4 being family F.  Munge it to be 686.

What is wrong with it? If i386, 486, 586 and 686 are valid names,
why should not 786 (or rather 1586... since someone thought it
would be cool to jump the number^1) be?


[^1 Which also is interesting because the original number had an 80
prepended, i.e. 80286, 80586,... and you'd guess what number 1586
would map to.]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/